Radiometric dating of sedimentary rocks is unreliable because

posted by | Leave a comment

Not only that, they have to show the flaws in those dating studies that provide independent corroborative evidence that radiometric methods work.

If the earth were only 6000–10 000 years old, then surely there should be some scientific evidence to confirm that hypothesis; yet the creationists have produced not a shred of it so far.

The results of the Manson Impact/Pierre Shale dating study (Izett and others 1998) are shown in Figure 1.

There are three important things to note about these results.

Such failures may be due to laboratory errors (mistakes happen), unrecognized geologic factors (nature sometimes fools us), or misapplication of the techniques (no one is perfect).

In order to accomplish their goal of discrediting radiometric dating, however, creationists are faced with the daunting task of showing that a preponderance of radiometric ages are wrong — that the methods are untrustworthy most of the time.

Leave a Reply

single parent dating sandpoint idaho