Website soulmates unlimited jewish dating
After that he proceeded with what can only be described as a military-technological Pearl-Harbor meets Stalingrad.
The strategic ramifications of the latest weapon systems Putin presented are immense. Of course, many American pundits, expectedly, dismissed that as bluster—it is expected from the US military “expert” community.
Saleem: You were driving the desert with out back up. Tony: Well Saleem, there's only one force on Earth that can short circuit a man's better instincts, put fire in his veins, makes him dive head long into danger with no regard for his own well being...
It is an appropriate term once one recalls what truly was at stake then.
The Pre-Shoigu Russian Army, for all its real and perceived shortcomings, disposed of the US-trained and partially equipped Georgian force in a matter of five days—the Russian Army’s technology, personnel and operational art was simply better.
Obviously such a scenario is not possible between Russia and the United States; that is unless the American myth of technological superiority is blown out of the water.
Paradoxically, this abyss is not where many do admit it—such as the RS-28 Sarmat ballistic missile, whose existence and approximate characteristics were more or less known for years.
This is a complete game changer geopolitically, strategically, operationally, tactically and psychologically.
Russians did win that war and, indeed, coerced Georgia into a much more peaceful mood.
In Clausewitzian terms the Russians achieved the main object of the war by compelling the enemy to do Russia’s will.
Others were not as dismissive and some were, indeed, deeply shocked.
The overall impression today, a day after Putin’s presentation, can be described in simple terms as such: the missile gap is real and, in fact, it is not a gap but a technological abyss.